Think Right, Act Right, Pack Right ..................Surveiller, Anticiper, Innover et Emballer
dimanche 7 octobre 2012
Sécurité alimentaire : Les emballages actifs et intelligents à la rescousse!!!
jeudi 17 mars 2011
Canadian Tire says green initiatives to cut $6M in costs
dimanche 10 octobre 2010
Polysole® XD: Solegear develops 100% natural, biodegradable polymer
vendredi 3 septembre 2010
Don't judge a cookie by its packaging
lundi 16 août 2010
Bisphénol A: la substance est présente chez 9 Canadiens sur 10
mercredi 4 août 2010
Derrière le bel emballage, un poison pour nos enfants
Une seule application, et dans une zone très localisée, en moins de 12h a causé cette réaction allergique chez mon fils de 3 ans. Ce matin c'est encore pire.
Le présumé coupable, ces 2 beaux flacons.
lundi 2 août 2010
Ottawa débloque 100 millions pour l'industrie forestière
dimanche 25 avril 2010
Biodegradable, or just a load of old rubbish?
As biodegradable bags have hit the market, consumers have also been hit by confusing information. Because all bags aren't created equal. Some bag manufacturers have been sued for making eco-claims that were not true, while some municipalities ban compostable bags because not all biodegradable bags are compostable ... leaving consumers confused about which bags actually benefit the environment. It also helps to know the difference between the terms biodegradable and compostable, says Susan Antler, executive director of the Compost Council of Canada. Biodegradable refers to a product that can change its chemical structure, but doesn't specify how long the change will take or what the product will change into. Compostable means a product will decompose in a composting site within a set time frame and turn into materials that form compost.
As a result, the label biodegradable is no longer considered a guarantor of green. "If a claim is that a product is only biodegradable, I don't even pay attention," says the Compost Council of Canada's Ms. Antler. "Biodegradation could be five, 100 or 500 years."
"In a landfill there is no oxygen and very little water. The biodegradation that takes place is absolutely minimal," Mr. Muir says. Consumers are mistaken if they believe the compostable shopping bags they get from a store and then throw out will quickly degrade into soil at a landfill.
A landfill isn't designed for materials to biodegrade. "It just compacts more than it breaks down," says Pat Parker, director of support services in Hamilton's operations and waste management division.
jeudi 15 octobre 2009
Certification papier au Canada : États des lieux
Il s’agit en fait d’une présentation que j’ai rapidement préparée hier pour remplacer au pied levé un conférencier qui venait de se désister. Ma conférence n’avait donc pas pour prétention d’être une présentation exhaustive sur le sujet, mais plutôt un bref état des lieux des systèmes de certification en vigueur au Canada.
L'objectif de cette journée était de démystifier les différentes certifications afin que les consommateurs opèrent des choix éclairés et durables. Trois certificateurs (FSC, SFI et CSA) sont intervenus.Ce que je retiens, c'est que le Canada est chef de file en matière de certification forestière et que les certifications sont des instruments crées pour contrôler les pratiques et actions largement critiquées de l’industrie forestière.
Toutefois, je trouve que la multitude de certificateurs et surtout la prolifération des logos peut avoir l’effet inverse à celui recherché. Le consommateur ne s’est plus où donner de la tête et en vient à s’interroger sur leur fiabilité.
Et la question demeure : Comment se retrouver dans cette « forêt » de logos ?
samedi 3 octobre 2009
Pea-starch film protects foods against microbes
Dr. Jung Han of the U of M's Department of Food Science said in a release this week that his main goal was to make a bioactive material delivery matrix -- a neutral food-grade material -- that could contain or incorporate various kinds of bioactive components. Making the pea starch film is easy because I used a regular extruder. It melts or gelatinizes the pea starch and rearranges the polymers' direction. The starch bundles that form are resistant to digestion by enzymes.
Starch-based plastic-like compostable containers can be made from potato starch, but Han said that product is mechanically weak. Adding pea starch to the mix helps increase its mechanical strength. Han says pea starch plastic is mechanically very strong.
He concluded that dried pea starch films can be used as a food wrapping or within the food, to separate food components. The resistance of the films to high relative humidity makes these films useful with moist foods.
"Pea starch film is strong, has intermediate stretchability and good barrier properties at high relative humidity, which make it applicable on intermediate and high moisture foods. It can be sprayed plain or carry functional ingredients on dried fruits, bread, chocolate and nuts," Han said.
A pea starch-based antimicrobial coating showed suitability to be used on raw chicken. The coating enhanced the antimicrobial activity of certain food preservatives.
jeudi 25 juin 2009
Evlon compostable, biodegradable film
“We fully understand the strain on the earth due to petroleum-based plastics,” says BI-AX CEO David Inglis. “So we devoted ourselves to becoming part of the solution with an R&D program resulting in a completely compostable, biodegradable film called Evlon. Evlon is available in a wide range of thicknesses that can be used in all manner of consumer packaging.”
Evlon is certified by the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) as a packaging material that can disintegrate and biodegrade quickly and safely when composted in a professionally managed facility. When composted all that remains is water and carbon dioxide.

mercredi 24 juin 2009
Sacs et bacs d'épicerie réutilisables et contamination croisée
Santé Canada rappelle aux Canadiens de prendre des précautions pour prévenir la contamination croisée d'aliments lorsqu'ils utilisent des sacs ou des bacs réutilisables pour faire l'épicerie. Par souci pour l'environnement, de nombreux Canadiens utilisent des bacs réutilisables, des sacs de plastique réutilisables ou des sacs en tissu pour réduire la quantité de plastique qu'ils utilisent. Santé Canada appuie l'utilisation de ces produits, mais il est important de les utiliser de façon sécuritaire afin de prévenir la contamination croisée des aliments par des bactéries pouvant causer des maladies d'origine alimentaire.
Parce que ces sacs et ces bacs en plastique sont réutilisés fréquemment, ils peuvent retenir des bactéries provenant des aliments transportés ou du milieu (du sol, de l'arrière de la voiture ou des bactéries présentes sur les articles qui y sont déposés entre les visites à l'épicerie).
Voir ici quelques conseils pour réduire le risque de contamination croisée.
lundi 11 mai 2009
La lutte au suremballage
Wal-Mart Canada s'est récemment engagé à réduire la taille de ses emballages de 5 % en cinq ans. Le porte-parole de l'entreprise Andrew Pelletier affirme que la mesure permettra de réduire de 213 000 le nombre de camions sur les routes.

Vigilance face au marketing environnemental
dimanche 19 avril 2009
Beat the Wrap : No Time to Waste
"We have been completely drilled into thinking of recycling as the solution to this problem of packaging (...) It is not. Recycling is the last thing you would do before you throw it away. What we really have to do is teach the hierarchy of the `Three Rs'; we must reduce first, then reuse and, finally, recycle." Heather Marshall, Toronto Environmental Alliance.

BY THE NUMBERS
- 383 kg Amount of solid waste generated by each Canadian in 2002
- 20% Percentage of that waste that was recycled or otherwise diverted
- 1 million Coffee cups discarded daily in Toronto
- 1 million Plastic water bottles discarded daily in Toronto
- 1 billion Bottles of water consumed by Canadians in 2008
- 400-800M Estimated number of those bottles that end up in landfill
- 1% Percentage of municipal solid waste in 1960 that was plastics
- 15% Percentage of municipal solid waste in 2001 that was plastics
- Apr 18, 2009: Why we have to cut down on packaging; how we got so wrapped up.
- Apr 19, 2009 : Trying to live a week without plastic; reducing the carbon footprint at the Air Canada Centre.
- Apr 20, 2009: Super-size packaging a legacy society finds tough to shrink.
- Apr 21, 2009: What you can and can't recycle throughout the GTA.
- Apr 22, 2009: Making the producer responsible for packaging waste; 10 things you can do; finding a substitute for plastic.
Waste packaging is choking our future as our landfills near capacity. Yet examples of excessive packaging destined for landfills can be found every day in virtually every store in the GTA.
mardi 10 mars 2009
Use of carbon monoxide in packaging ground beef would extend shelf life
Hamburger with a much longer shelf life using carbon monoxide-based technology may some day be coming to your local supermarket. Although the packaging is available in U.S. grocery stores, it has not yet been approved by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, says Sven Anders, principal investigator of a study on consumer acceptance of the technology conducted at the University of Alberta.
"The use of carbon monoxide in this type of modified atmosphere packaging has been used in a variety of food applications, but it has not in meat packaging," Anders, a professor of rural economy at the university, said in an interview.
The process seals a small amount of carbon monoxide gas inside the hamburger package, stabilizing the fresh cherry-red colour that he says consumers consistently prefer over light-red or brownish-coloured meat.
This gives the meat an extended shelf life of up to 14 days, exceeding the current three-day window.
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colourless gas that when inhaled can be fatal, says the University of Guelph-based Food Safety Network. However, it says when the gas is used in packaging it is not harmful to health.
In the U.S., much media attention was given to the proposal of a complete ban on the use of carbon monoxide in foods by consumer groups and companies prior to its acceptance by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006.
For his research, Anders did a small study of Alberta consumers to see if there would be acceptance. He found that 60 per cent of the 205 people polled would be willing to pay more for the cherry-red colour and extended shelf life when they learned it was artificially obtained through the CO-modified atmosphere packaging process.
But he adds that prominent labelling and public information would be crucial factors in getting all shoppers to buy into the new packaging.
"The product looks better, but people would have to pay close attention to the expiry date."
In 2001, the European Commission carried out a review of the safety of carbon monoxide in foods and determined the application to be safe. It has been used in Norway for 20 years without incident.
However, the commission decided that most consumers were not ready to accept the technology and the use of carbon monoxide was prohibited.
Anders says he would like to see the carbon monoxide technology used in Canada for the savings an extended shelf life would bring to meat processors and retail distributors and ultimately to consumers.
Anders' findings, which he and a research team in the U.S. and Germany have presented at several conferences, were endorsed by the Canadian Meat Council and funded by the Alberta Livestock Industry Development Fund and the Canadian Beef Information Centre.
Alastair Sinclair, a spokesman for Health Canada, says that the use of carbon monoxide to improve the appearance and extend the shelf life of ground beef is not currently allowed in Canada.
"Should an applicant wish to use this technology on product to be sold in Canada, they would first have to make a submission to Health Canada to allow the use of the technology," he said in a statement.
"This submission would have to contain scientific information demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of the process," he says. "Health Canada scientists would review this data, along with any other information published in the scientific literature."
"Only once Health Canada scientists are satisfied that the process is safe and effective would it be allowed for use in Canada."
Pros and cons of modified atmosphere packaging
Here are the advantages and disadvantages of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), the technique used for prolonging the shelf life of fresh or minimally processed foods:
Pros:
- Longer shelf life allows wider distribution of food
- Fresh foods available year-round
- Attractive see-through packaging
- Requires less storage space time and labour for retailer
- Expensive equipment and materials (gases and packaging)
- Increased cost of transportation
- Potential safety risk as people may not keep the foods under the necessary storage conditions (refrigeration)
jeudi 5 mars 2009
Bisphénol A : À quand l’interdiction du BPA dans les matériaux alimentaires?
Après les biberons, les bouteilles en plastique et les conserves, et donc désormais les canettes, quel sera le prochain sur la liste?samedi 21 février 2009
Canada: vers la conception d'emballages plus écologiques
Une stratégie nationale proposée par les ministres de l'Environnement de tout le pays pourrait forcer le monde des affaires à payer pour la récupération des emballages non-biodégradables et leur réutilisation.Le plan vise également à favoriser l'innovation afin de concevoir des emballages plus écologiques, puisque les entreprises seraient forcées d'améliorer la durabilité des produits, à défaut de quoi elles devront faire face à des conséquences financières.
"L'argument dépassé selon lequel c'est l'économie contre l'environnement ne tient simplement plus la route", a affirmé le ministre de l'Environnement de l'Ontario et président du CCME, John Gerretsen.
Le plan est jumelé avec une autre stratégie sur l'emballage réutilisable, qui établirait des normes plus strictes visant à s'assurer que les emballages puissent être réutilisés, recyclés ou au moins récupérés et gérés de manière à ce qu'ils ne soient plus simplement jetés ou enfouis dans des sites prévus à cet effet.
"Le CCME cherche à transformer le Canada, l'un des pays dans le monde qui génère le plus de déchets par habitant, en un pays qui deviendrait le chef de file dans la conception de produits durables et dans la gestion des produits à la fin de leur vie", a-t-on pu lire dans un des documents de travail du conseil.
Selon Statistique Canada, le Canada a généré presque 1100 kilogrammes de déchets solides municipaux par personne en 2006, une hausse de 8 pour cent par rapport à 2004.
Mais les consommateurs ne sont pas les seuls responsables puisqu'ils ne peuvent pas souvent décider de l'emballage des produits qu'ils consomment. De plus, les entreprises chargées de l'emballage ne prennent pas souvent en compte la fin de vie de leurs produits lorsqu'ils les conçoivent, selon un autre document de travail.
Le plan, qui pourrait être implanté d'ici à six ans, forcerait les entreprises à être responsables de la récupération des emballages, des documents imprimés, des ampoules fluorescentes compactes, des produits électroniques et électriques, des déchets ménagers dangereux et spéciaux et des produits pour l'automobile.
D'ici à huit ans, le plan couvrira également la construction et la démolition des matériaux, les meubles, les textiles et les tapis et les électroménagers, particulièrement ceux faits avec des substances appauvrissant la couche d'ozone.
Les entreprises cotiseraient à un système visant à gérer collectivement les produits qu'on dit "historiques" ou "orphelins", qui ont été crées par des entreprises qui ne sont plus en affaires et des entreprises qui essayent d'éviter de se conformer à la nouvelle réglementation.
Le plan propose également la nomination d'un ombudsman qui pourrait répondre aux plaintes du public sur l'emballage inadéquat et la responsabilité des entreprises.
Une porte-parole de l'Institut canadien du droit et de la politique de l'environnement, Maureen Carter-Whitney, a affirmé qu'elle était satisfaite des réformes proposées, mais qu'elle aurait souhaité qu'elles soient implantées plus rapidement.
mercredi 18 février 2009
Canada : Consultations sur l'emballage écologique
mercredi 17 décembre 2008
PGBC answers recyclers on its Reverte™ oxo-biodegradable PET plastic bottle
The PGBC oxo-biodegradable PET plastic bottle can be thrown into a municipal recycling “blue box” because it is compatible with all current recycling streams for PET plastic bottles.Oxo-biodegradability is therefore an insurance policy against buying a PET plastic bottle and finding that your discarded bottle is one of the 3 out of 4 PET plastic bottles that goes to landfill or is littered. At least your bottle will not last forever to pollute the environment for future generations.
Nick Havercroft, Chairman of Planet Green stated:
"Retailers and consumers are becoming more educated and sophisticated about plastic. There are approximately 200 billion PET plastic bottles used per year globally. If 75% do not get into the recycling stream, that means 150 billion PET plastic bottles annually are discarded somewhere in our eco-system. Wouldn’t it be nice to know that an ingredient was added to the resin at time of manufacture that makes that bottle disappear in 5 to 15 years rather than never? Our proprietary ‘Oxo-Bio Reverte™’ logo on a bottler’s label will attract the most caring consumer that is likely a pro-recycling enthusiast. We are recycling enthusiasts but we have designed an insurance policy on the 150 billion PET plastic bottles annually not yet being recycled. We currently have grocery chains and brand beverage bottlers stepping up to the plate to be early adopters in order to get a first mover advantage. We believe a consumer movement to buy our oxo-biodegradable plastic bottles will follow shortly thereafter".
"Unfortunately, the un-informed have equated biodegradability with corn and/or vegetable-based “plastic” bottles. These PLA-based bottles and additives are not friendly to PET plastic recycling streams therefore oxo-biodegradability gets tarred with the brush of contamination of recycled PET plastic bottles. PLA-based bottles must be collected separately for inclusion in a program of commercial composting. Planet Green’s additive is designed to be compatible with PET plastic, making it totally recycling and “blue box” friendly. Our “Oxo-Bio Reverte™” conscious consumers will lead the way to higher recycling rates!”
dimanche 14 septembre 2008
Toronto : City eyes coffee cup ban
The City of Toronto is targeting some of its biggest garbage offenders – coffee cups, takeout food containers and plastic bags – in a study that could lead to sweeping changes in the way residents handle their refuse.As part of Toronto's plan to be diverting 70 per cent of its garbage from landfill by 2010, the city is examining ways to limit items that have a bad reputation for filling up landfills.
- An outright ban
- A levy or tax on the items. (Charging extra would presumably influence consumers to use recyclable cups or containers.)
- A deposit-return program similar to the provincial bottle return program, whereby consumers get at least a portion of their money back if they turn in the container, making the seller responsible for recycling it.
- A proposal pushed by Councillor Howard Moscoe targets cardboard and plastic store packaging, most of which ends up in the garbage stream. Stores in Toronto should be required to provide space where customers can take their purchases out of the packaging and leave the garbage behind, Moscoe says. This would put pressure on the manufacturers – over whom Toronto has no control – to reduce the amount of packaging on their products.



